![]() ![]() The DMV’s order bans Cruise from operating its driverless taxis until the company shows the department that it’s “taken the appropriate action to correct the deficiencies that caused the suspension.” It’s unclear what the DMV will deem appropriate action, though Cruise can request a hearing to contest the suspension. “They later requested a copy of the complete video, which we provided to them.” ![]() “We met with the DMV on 10/3, in which we showed them the complete video multiple times,” a company spokesperson told me this week. “Cruise’s omission hinders the ability of the department to effectively and timely evaluate the safe operation of Cruise’s vehicles and puts the safety of the public at risk,” DMV staff wrote in their suspension order.Ĭruise has denied the DMV’s statements that it omitted footage. ![]() They requested that footage from Cruise, receiving it 10 days after the initial meeting. Cruise only showed the AV’s initial collision and DMV officials said they only learned about the second maneuver from another government agency. The other: that Cruise representatives omitted footage of that pullover maneuver when they presented video recordings of the incident during a meeting with DMV and California Highway Patrol officials. The fact that the vehicle continued with the pedestrian trapped underneath was one reason the DMV cited in its suspension orders. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |